In a recent survey of planning and budgeting practices, analysts Aberdeen Group, found that the ‘Best in Class’ - the 20% of respondents who had shorter budget cycles, more accurate budgets and who had actually improved their year-on-year profitability by 20% or more, were roughly twice as likely to use methodologies such as zero-based budgeting and driver-based budgeting – the majority sticking to tweaking the previous year’s actuals.
Driver-based budgeting is something close to my heart in that I wrote a book on it back in 2007 – Planning and Budgeting for the Agile Enterprise. Other than receiving a few metaphorical pats on the back from the folk who make their living by writing or lecturing about performance management, the book languished on the Amazon listings where it has stubbornly remained for the last few years, while I moved on to travel writing which is both more enjoyable and more lucrative. But clearly driver-based budgeting hasn’t gone away. In fact, Aberdeen found that the ‘Best in Class’ enjoyed some considerable benefits in that they were more able to perform ‘what-if?’ analysis and re-forecast as market conditions change. Given that many people talk about rolling re-forecasts, but few can actually achieve the frequency they desire it looks as though driver-based budgeting is on the ascendant; an idea whose time has finally come.
Now the interesting thing is that the Aberdeen research didn’t find much difference in the type of software used for budgeting between the ‘Best in Class’ companies and the industry average. So although enterprise applications may help improve productivity in finance and make the data easier to manage, it’s not the technology that is making the difference here. It’s the simple step of moving away from traditional budgeting, (little more than the collection and collation of line item expenses to my mind), and adopting a driver-based methodology that makes the difference.
Being a numbers business, telecoms is an ideal industry in which to implement a driver-based approach to planning and budgeting and I’ve written before about how I sat through a breakfast meeting at SAP Sapphire in Orlando earlier this year and was gladdened to hear to Sandy Rogers, Director of Financial Systems at Qwest Communications talk on their adoption of driver-based planning and budgeting that consulting organization
Column 5 Consulting helped them implement in
SAP BusinessObjects Planning and Consolidation. Sandy shared some of the benefits of the approach as well of some of the change management issues in helping financial analysts and business folk move away from the ultimately false security that comes from a traditional approach to budgeting with its endless line item detail. It was compelling stuff. Who knows; if this momentum continues then that book might just begin to pay back on the time and effort invested in writing it!